2017 (12) TMI 1611

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e interest expenditure to the tune of ₹ 3,05,731/- against the aforesaid expenditure. We find merit in the limited plea of the assessee that the expenditure should be restricted to the extent of dividend income. A decision of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs. Taikisha Engineering (I) Ltd. [2014 (12) TMI 482 - DELHI HIGH COURT] where in similar facts observed that the dis .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the Act ) dated 18/02/2015 relevant to Assessment Year (AY) 2012-13. 2. The sole grievance of the assessee is that the revenue has disallowed interest expenses amounting to ₹ 3,05,731/- attributable to earning of dividend income of ₹ 7,338/-. 3. With the assistance of the Ld.AR for the assessee, we find that the assessee has earned dividend income of ₹ 7,338/- from invest .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X