TMI Blog2000 (7) TMI 33X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ibunal, Amritsar Bench, Amritsar ("the Tribunal"), has referred the following questions of law to this Court for the opinion at the instance of the Revenue: "1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in holding that the assessment for the relevant year, made in the assessee's case, was affected by the rule laid down in the case of S. Mubarik Sha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ing that if the assessment is affected by the rule laid down by the Jammu and Kashmir High Court in the case of S. Mubarik Shah Naqshbandi vs. CIT, the ITO could not have derived the satisfaction required for the levy of penalty in the course of assessment in terms of the provisions of s. 271 ? 4. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in cancel ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... done on the same sheet of paper, viz., the assessment order; it is sufficient compliance with the requirements of s. 143(3) of the IT Act, 1961, if the tax payable is also computed and the computation is approved by the ITO, either immediately or some time later. In the instant case, there is no dispute about the fact that the tax payable had been duly determined in a separate sheet, namely, asses ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rovided in s. 246 of the Act both against the order of assessment and the order of penalty. Any person objecting to any penalty imposed by the AO under s. 271 may appeal to the AAC under cl. (o) of s. 246(1) (as it stood at the material time). There is a separate provision in cl. (c) of s. 246(1) for appeal against an order of assessment under ss. 143(3) and 147. Appeal against an order of reasses ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
