9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (10) TMI 644X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Pandey (Advocate) for Appellant Shri Rajeev Ranjan (Addl. Commr.) AR for Respondent ORDER Per: Anil G. Shakkarwar Present appeal is directed against the Order-in-Appeal No. GZB-EXCUS-000-APP-0359-15-16 dated 14.03.2016 passed by Commissioner (Appeals), Customs and Central Excise, Meerut-II at Noida. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant were registered with the Department for ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... basis of profit and loss accounts for the year 2010-2011 taking into consideration sundry debtors. It was alleged that the said amount was released during the year 2011-2012 and, therefore, appellant was required to pay service tax amounting to Rs. 21,81,838/-. Further, on the basis of Balance Sheet for the year 2011-2012 an amount of service tax of Rs. 1,36,490/- was demanded. On contest the issu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t scrutinizing the transactions for which said amounts were received and without examining whether said amounts were already reflected in the ST-3 returns filed. He has contended that it was held by this Tribunal in the case of British Physical Laboratories (I) Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore reported at 1999 (107) ELT 107 (Tribunal) that a Balance Sheet is a financial document ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... notice is not sustainable since the same was issued under extended period when everything was disclosed including service tax payable disclosed in ST-3 return and that the remaining demands were on the basis of Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss Account and the same are not sustainable in the light of the above stated Final Order of this Tribunal. 4. Heard the learned AR who has supported the impu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
