2018 (11) TMI 76

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... or the Respondent. ORDER Per: Mr. M.V. Ravindran 1. This appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. 51/2009 (H-IV) CE, dated 23.11.2009. 2. Heard both sides and perused the records. 3. The facts in brief are the appellants herein are the manufacturers of cosmetic and toilet preparations, pharmaceutical products and miscellaneous edible preparations at Hyderabad besides branded goods of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... penalty. Aggrieved by such an order, an appeal was preferred before the first appellate authority who has also confirmed the demands raised alongwith interest and imposed penalty and dismissed the appeal. 4. Ld. Counsel submits that identical issue of the same assessee is decided by the Bench as reported at [2015(324) E.L.T. 565 (Tri.-Bang.) and produces a copy of the same. He also submits that f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X