TMI Blog2002 (1) TMI 1326X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ection 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code and granting anticipatory bail to the accused, which condition was affirmed by the High Court. Be it stated that an FIR having been lodged alleging commission of an offence by the appellant under Sections 406/ 420 of Indian Penal Code, the appellant moved the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi for grant of anticipatory bail invoking this jurisdiction ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r it is filed in the Court. The accused being aggrieved by the condition requiring to deposit the sum of ₹ 15 lacs, moved the High Court. The High Court by the impugned order having affirmed the same, the accused has moved this Court. 3. The contention of the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant is that notwithstanding the fact that under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... this contention, reliance was placed on a decision of this Court in Sandeep Jain v. National Capital Territory of Delhi, . The learned Counsel appearing for the State, on the other hand objected to the variation of the condition, particularly when according to the learned Counsel the accused himself conceded to the amount being kept in deposit. From the order of the learned Additional Sessions Jud ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n the Trial Court, and on the other hand direct that on executing a bond to the tune of ₹ 25,000/- with two solvent sureties to the satisfaction of the concerned Magistrate, and further that the accused shall make himself available for interrogation whenever is required and the accused should surrender his passport immediately to the concerned Magistrate where the matter is pending and would ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
