TMI Blog2015 (8) TMI 1459X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... etitioning-creditor. It would be evident from the certificate of February 17, 2014 and the company s e-mail of July 15, 2014 that the company has no defence to the claim. CP is admitted for the principal sum of ₹ 3,87,49,003/- together with interest thereon at the rate of 8 per cent per annum from February 11, 2014, which is the date indicated in the letter of February 17, 2014 issued by ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... behalf of the company is that the petitioning-creditor has not been able to affirmatively establish its claim. The company indicates that the rates charged by the petitioning-creditor for the transport services rendered have been contemporaneously questioned as excessive by the company. The claim is to the tune of ₹ 3,87,49,003/- on account of transportation service rendered by the petiti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 3,87,49,003/-, the company disputed the claim and demanded that the work orders, invoices and other documentary evidence in support of the claim be supplied to it by the petitioner. The company s reply of May 8, 2014 was dealt with on behalf of the petitioner by advocate s letter of June 24, 2014 by which the petitioner enclosed some documents and maintained that all documents in support of the c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ued by your advocate on your behalf and all legal cases filed, if any, in any forum. A line of confirmation in this regard will be appreciated. There does not appear to be any doubt as to the amount claimed to be due by the petitioning-creditor. It would be evident from the certificate of February 17, 2014 and the company s e-mail of July 15, 2014 that the company has no defence to the claim. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
