Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2018 (11) TMI 1464

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rvice have to be given the salaries within due time. If the service receivers delay the payment, it would cause much hardship to the service provider as they have to make the statutory payments such EPF, ESI etc. to the Government - the appellant has put forward reasonable cause for not paying the service tax within due time and is a fit case for invoking Section 80 of the Finance Act for setting aside the penalties. The impugned order is modified to the extent of setting aside the penalties imposed under sections 76 as well as 78 in these appeals - appeal allowed in part. - Appeal Nos. ST/300 & 301/2012 - Final Order Nos. 42768-42769/2018 - Dated:- 23-10-2018 - Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) And Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ere is no allegation of any unaccounted transactions in the show cause notice. Though the appellant did not file the returns for April 2005 to September 2009, it was only because the appellant was under the impression that without paying the full liability of service tax amount, they cannot file the returns. The case is only of belated payments and there was no intention to evade payment of service tax. He argued that the appellant is a proprietary concern of which Smt. Revathi is the Proprietrix. Her husband was supporting her business and they had very low knowledge and understanding of the laws. There was much belated payment from the service receivers and the appellant could barely mange to meet the payment of salary and other expenses .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The ld. consultant has furnished documents to argue that there was only delay in payment of service tax and there was no act of suppression of facts with intention to evade payment of service tax. On perusal of the documents such as the list of sundry debtors etc., it is seen that there was huge amount pending as receivables. So also they had to meet expenses for salary, accident compensation of employees provided under manpower supply service. The department does not have a case that any of the transactions were unaccounted or that they had been indulging in a parallel accounting. It is commonly understood that the employees supplied through manpower supply service have to be given the salar .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates