Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2018 (11) TMI 1532

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... (Advocate) For Respondent: Shri Sameer Chitkara (A.R.) ORDER Per: Ramesh Nair The brief facts of the case are that the appellant are engaged in manufacture, interalia of Detergent, Soaps and Surfactants. The other appellants are Sh. Paresh D. Patel, Director of appellant company and Sh. Shashikant Pandey, Vice President of the appellant company. In Nov 2014, the appellant filed 4 shipping .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... aried from 0.13% to 1.08% by weight. The content of Sodium Chloride varied from 89% to 95% by weight. The DRI contended that since the major constituent in the goods was Sodium Chloride and since the active matter "LABSA" was only in the range of 0.13% to 1.08%, the goods cannot be considered as "Linear Alkyl Benzene Sulphonic Acid Sodium Salt (Industrial Surfactant)" and that accordingly, the des .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ium chloride or common salt and accordingly, the notice sought to adopt the value of contemporary exports of salt. It was further contended in the SCN that the appellant had filed shipping bills in respect of Advance Authorization and as per the Standard Input-Output Norms; the export goods should contain 72% of active matter. The SCN, however, did not dispute the classification of the goods under .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ting authority also imposed the penalties under Section 114 (iii) of the Customs Act, 1962. He has imposed a further penalty of Rs. 5 Lacs on Paresh D. Patel, Director under Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962. 2. We have heard both the sides and considered the submissions made by both the sides. Before going into the overall merit of the case, we observed that the adjudicating authority has d .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... having any such proposal in the SCN. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned order and remand the matter to the adjudicating authority for passing a fresh order after taking into account our above observation. All the issues are kept open. The appeals are allowed by way of remand to the adjudicating authority. (Pronounced in the open court on 27.11.2018)
Case laws, Decisions, Judgements, Orde .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates