TMI Blog2018 (12) TMI 588X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... stitution of India, to the extent the said provision restricts validity period of the e-way bill in terms of distance to be travelled in a day. 2. Mr. Vinay Shraff, learned advocate with Mr. Vishal Dave, learned advocate for the petitioners invited the attention of the court to the notice under section 129(3) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (Annexure "J" to the petition), to point out that in terms of the said notice, the petitioner was directed to appear before the State Tax Officer-2 on 02.10.2018. It was submitted that in response to the notice, the petitioner filed its reply. Reference was made to the impugned order passed under section 129(3) of the Act, to point out that the same has been passed on 28.09.2018 without w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... an fraud or any willful misstatement or suppression of facts, and more particularly, to sub-section (8) thereof, which provides that where any person chargeable with tax under sub-section (1) or sub-section (3) pays the said tax along with interest payable under section 50 within thirty days of issue of show cause notice, no penalty shall be payable and all proceedings in respect of the said notice shall be deemed to be concluded. It was submitted that in the facts of the present case, the petitioner had deposited the amount of tax and penalty within thirty days from the date of issue of the notice and therefore, the petitioner was entitled to the benefit of sub-section (8) of section 73 of the Act. 6. Reference was also made to section 74 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... -GST dated 14th September, 2018 and more particularly, clause (5) thereof, which provides that in case a consignment of goods is accompanied with an invoice or any other specified document and also an e-way bill, proceedings under section 129 of the CGST Act may not be initiated, inter alia, in the situations enumerated thereunder. It was submitted that the situations enumerated in the said circular are illustrative and not exhaustive. Therefore, a mistake in writing distance can be deemed to have been included within the ambit of the said circular. 9. Another contention raised by the learned advocate for the petitioner is that in terms of the Government of India circular No.3/3/2017-GST dated 5th July, 2017, the functions under different ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|