TMI Blog1998 (6) TMI 32X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bombay Bench "E", Bombay ("the Tribunal"), dated March 16, 1996, by which, the Tribunal rejected the miscellaneous application of the petitioners praying for recalling the order passed in one miscellaneous application filed by the petitioner earlier for rectification of the order of the Tribunal dated April 28, 1994. We have heard Mr. Dastur, learned counsel for the pet ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . It appears that the petitioners also took out some miscellaneous application for rectification of the very same order of the Tribunal dated April 28, 1994. Those applications were rejected by the Tribunal by its order dated August 11, 1994. Aggrieved by that order, the petitioners filed an application for reference under section 256(1) of the Act seeking reference of a question "whether the Tr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ibunal by filing miscellaneous petitions. That attempt also was foiled by the Tribunal by rejecting the applications and also the reference application taken out by the petitioners against the same. The petitioners did not proceed further in the matter and, in our opinion, rightly so. By this writ petition, the petitioners now seek to have a third round to get the order of the Tribunal set aside w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
