9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (4) TMI 1630X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... bham Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri C.B. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos. 1,3 and 4 and Sri Anant Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2. By means of the present writ petition the petitioner has challenged the jurisdiction of the respondent nos. 1,3 and 4 as well as the the seizure of the consignment of goods which was going from Kanpur ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... are not mentioned and the same are being mentioned subsequently after downloading the E-Way Bill in handwriting. Seizing authority doubted the transaction on the basis of the hand written details of the vehicle number and has seized the goods as well as vehicle. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the opposite parties. With the consent of the parties the ins ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... arge of IGST and Central Cess, we find no irregularity in the transaction in question, hence, the goods and the vehicle seized on 27th March, 2018 by the respondent no. 4 are directed to be released forthwith. The seizure order dated 27.03.2018 as well as notice issued under Section 129(3) (Annexure-3) dated 27.03.2018 are hereby quashed.
The writ petition is allowed. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
