Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (1) TMI 241

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ischarged by utilizing such subsidy challans cannot be taken as VAT actually paid. Tribunal in the Welspun Corporation Ltd. [2017 (10) TMI 1303 - CESTAT MUMBAI] conclude that there is no justification for inclusion in the assessable value, the VAT amounts paid by the assessee using VAT 37B Challans. Appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. - Appeal No. E/52352/2018-(DB) - A/53389/2018-EX[DB] - Dated:- 29-11-2018 - Mr. Anil Choudhary, Member (Judicial) And Mr Bijay Kumar, Member (Technical) Smt. Ashmita Nayak, Adv. for the appellant Shri R.K. Mishra, DR for the respondent ORDER Per: Bijay Kumar 1. This appeal deal with an identical issue and hence are being disposed through this common order. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Nayak, Ld. Advocate for the appellant as well as Shri R.K. Mishra, Ld. DR for the Department. 4. The Ld. Counsel for the appellant explained in detail the scheme of the Rajasthan Government regarding the grant of subsidy for new enterprises. He explained that the VAT is initially paid to the Government of Rajasthan before a portion of the same is granted as subsidy in the form of Challan Form 37B. Such challan is one of the modes which is allowed to be utilized for payment of VAT in the subsequent period along with other modes of payment including cash and input tax credit. He contended that the Revenue has wrongly proceeded under the presumption that the tax paid through 37B Challan does not represent actual payment of tax. He stressed .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ain portion is disbursed back to them in the form of subsidies. Such disbursement happens in the form of VAT 37 B, challan which can be utilized in subsequent periods to discharge VAT liability. The crux of the dispute in the present case is whether such subsidy amounts are required to be included in the assessable value of the goods manufactured by the appellants, in terms of Section 4 of the Central Excise Act. As per the concept of transaction value outlined in Section 4, with effect from 01/07/2000, any sales tax/VAT actually paid can be deducted from the transaction value for payment of excise duty. Revenue has taken the view that payment of VAT using 37B Challans cannot be considered as actual payment of VAT. 8. Both sides have ref .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... company opted for Remission of Tax Scheme and was thus eligible for the Capital subsidy in the form of remission of Sales Tax subject to the conditions to be fulfilled . The subsidy in the form of remission of sales tax was in fact a percentage of capital investment Separate assessment orders were thus issued by the assessing officer of the sales tax department from time to time towards the incentive scheme amount. The Competent Authority was required to necessarily pass order for remission of such tax separately for each tax period. The remission of tax is thus directly related to capital investment in fixed asset. There was no option to claim exemption from payment of sales tax. The quantum of remission was based upon the investment m .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates