9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (2) TMI 377X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... MALLIKARJUN SAHUKAR, HCGP) JUDGMENT ARAVIND KUMAR J., This appeal under Section 66(1) of the Act preferred by the assessee is against a suo-moto revisional proceedings initiated under Section 22-A(1) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 (for short 'Act'), contending interalia that substantial question of law formulated in the appeal memorandum would arise for consideration. 2. Appellan ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed by the said assessment order, assessee filed writ petition in W.P.No.49680/2004, which came to be dismissed by order dated 03.01.2005 reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail alternative remedy of appeal available under the Act. Hence, assessee preferred an appeal No.109, which came to be considered by the appellate authority and by order dated 10.04.2007 appeal came to be allowed and recom ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rity came to be set aside and order of the assessing officer came to be restored. Hence, this appeal. 5. We have heard the arguments of Sri. Ameet Kumar Deshpande, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Sri. Mallikarjun Sahukar, HCGP appearing for the State. Perused the records. 6. As could be seen from the impugned order, it has been concluded ex-parte. It is no doubt true that ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on to stave-off his liability. That apart, it has been contended that appellant is a permanent resident of Bengaluru and has been residing there and notice issued to petitioner by the revisional authority is to the Bijapur address and there was no due service of notice by the revisional authority. Without examining said issue, it would suffice to note that revisional authority had disposed of the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... judication afresh, since suo-motto revisional proceedings relates to the period 2001-02. (3) Petitioner is hereby directed to appear before the respondent on 03.01.2019 at 3.00 pm without waiting for further notice from said authority. (4) Respondent shall dispose of the revision proceedings on merits and in accordance with law expeditiously and at any rate within eight (8) weeks from the afores ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
