TMI Blog2019 (3) TMI 355X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Court to examine the correctness of the stand taken by the petitioner as to whether they have received the Order-in-Original and whether they were put on notice prior to initiation of adjudication proceeding on account of subsequent events - On account of the fact that if the petitioner is discharging the export obligation, then the very fact will stand effaced. However, the Representations sent ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... xport obligation and therefore, the petitioner would not be entitled to the benefit under EPCG Licence/Authorization issued to the petitioner. 3. The petitioner s case is that no notice was served on the petitioner and the copy of the Order-in-Original was not received by them. In this regard, when a report was sent by the petitioner, the respondent by reply dated 9-1-2013, informed the petitio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... petitioner vide representation dated 2-7-2013, has brought to the notice of the respondent and requested them to drop the proposal. This representation was followed by another reminder dated 24-7-2013, which was received by the respondent on 25-7-2013 as evidenced by the Department date of seal. Thus, on account of the fact that if the petitioner is discharging the export obligation, then the very ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
