9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (3) TMI 985X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... .4 and 3.14.5 of the Foreign Trade Policy for the balance amount of Rs. 6,59,65,508.03. 3. The facts of the case briefly stated are thus : The petitioner is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. It is engaged in the manufacture and export of Pneumatic Tyres of Chapter 40 of First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The refusal to issue duty credit scrip to the extent of Rs. 6,59,65,508/ by invoking paragraph 3.14.5 (C)(i) of the Foreign Trade Policy 20092014 read with Notification No.43(RE200914) dated 25/9/2013 is challenged in this Petition as being contrary to the binding judgment of this Court in the case of JSW Steel Ltd. Vs. Union of India (2016 (334) E.L.T. 222 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ublic Notifications dated 17th May, 2013, 25th September, 2013 and another Notification No.43 (RE2013)/200914 of the same date viz. 25th September, 2013. For the sake of brevity we are not reproducing these Notifications as all these Notifications are considered in the case of JSW Steel Ltd. (supra) neither are we setting out the facts in detail as the present case is squarely covered by the case of JSW Steel Ltd. (supra). The said decision is followed by this Court in subsequent Petitions filed by the petitioners therein claiming similar relief. 8. In view of the Incremental Export Growth achieved by the petitioner and having realized the sale proceeds in convertible foreign exchange, vide online application dated 24th March, 20 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... oever. 10. By a letter dated 8th January, 2016 to the Joint Director General of Foreign Trade, Mumbai, the petitioner requested reconsideration of its case for issuance of the balance scrip amounting to Rs. 6.60 crores at the earliest. By a letter dated 17th February, 2016, the petitioner brought to the notice of respondent No.3 various decisions of this Court which covers the issue and requested that its representation be considered favourably. 11. The petitioner by a letter dated 30th May, 2016, brought all these facts to the notice of Mr. Anup Wadhawan, the then incumbent Director General of Foreign Trade, New Delhi. The office of the respondent No.3 by a letter dated 17th November, 2016 informed the petitioner that the request for iss ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
