Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (3) TMI 1495

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... DABAD], where it was held that Management, maintenance and repair of windmills installed by the respondents is input service as defined by clause "l" of Rule 2. Rule 3 and 4 provide that any input or capital goods received in the factory or any input service received by manufacture of final product would be susceptible to CENVAT credit. Rule does not say that input service received by a manufacturer must be received at the factory premises. Appeal dismissed - decided against Revenue. - No.E/40183/2013 E/CO/41756/2013 & E/40184/2013 - FINAL ORDER No. 40600-40601/2019 - Dated:- 25-3-2019 - Ms. Sulekha Beevi, C.S., Member (Judicial) and Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical) Shri L. Nanda Kumar, AC (AR) For the Appellant .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y or indirectly, in our in relation to the manufacture of final products and clearance of final products from the place of removal. Though the definition of input service has to be widely construed, and in terms of Rule 3, which allows the manufacturer of final products to take the credit of service tax inputs or capital goods received in the factory of manufacture of final products, insofar as any input service is concerned, the only stipulation is that it should be received by the manufacturer of final products. Therefore, this would be the correct manner of interpreting Rule 2(I) of the Rules. 26. In the light of the above, we are of the considered view that the decision in the case of Ellora Times Ltd. (supra) does not lay down .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... judgment by referring to judgment of Apex Court. In the case of Deepak Fertilizers Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd. v. C.C.Ex. Belapur [cited supra] the Division Bench held as under : The definition of the expression input service‟ covers any services used by the manufacturer, whether directly or indirectly, in or in relation to the manufacture of final products. The words directly or indirectly‟ and in or in relation to‟ are words of width and amplitude. The subordinate legislation has advisedly used a broad and comprehensive expression while defining the expression input service‟. Rule 2(l) initially provides that input service means any services of the description falling in subclauses (i) and (ii). Ru .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n the factory of manufacturer of the final product, insofar as any input service is concerned, the only stipulation is that it should be received by the manufacturer of the final product. This must be read with the broad and comprehensive meaning of the expression input service‟ in Rule 2(l). The input services in the present case were used by the appellant whether directly or indirectly, in or in relation to the manufacture of final products. The appellant, it is undisputed, manufactures dutiable final products and the storage and use of ammonia is an intrinsic part of that process. 6 . In view of this discussion, we have no hesitation to hold that the answer to question No. (I) is in affirmative. Despite this settled position, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates