2019 (4) TMI 485

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... es for the Petitioner. Ms. Priyanka Kamat, Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. B. Khandeparkar, Advocate for Respondent No.3. Mr. D. Gautam, Inspector (GST) present in person. P.C.: Heard Mr. S.D. Padiyar, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, Ms. Priyanka Kamat, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.1 and 2 and Mr. B. Khandeparkar, learned Counsel for Respondent No.3. 2. Rul .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he issue of limitation; (iii) The amount already recovered by Respondents No.1 and 2 from the Petitioner's Bank Account with the Respondent No.3, shall abide by the final orders that shall be made by the Appellate Authority in the appeal so instituted; (iv) Since the Respondents No. 1 and 2 have already recovered the amount from the Petitioner, the Appellate Authority shall not insist upon a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he date of its institution; 4. The learned Counsel for the parties state that the aforesaid agreement is on the basis of instructions from their respective parties, in particular, Mr. D. Gautam, Inspector GST, who is present in the Court. 5. This order is made in the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, including, in particular, the circumstance that there is no proof of service of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X