Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1991 (4) TMI 453

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... terminating the services with effect from January 9, 1969. Calling in question the order of termination, the respondent laid the suit for declaration that the termination without enquiry and an opportunity of being heard was violative of Rule 9A of the Madhya Pradesh Civil Service Classification Control Appeal (Rules), 1966 with consequential declaration that he became a permanent employee of the corporation with cotiuity of service and arrears of salary. The Trial Court dismissed the suit and on appeal it was confirmed. The High Court in Second Appeal No. 315/70 by judgment and decree dated April 11, 1977 allowed the appeal and decreed the suit as prayed for. On leave under Art. 136 the Appellant filed this appeal. Shri S.k.Gambhir, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... inal post. On expiry of the period of two years, no action was taken by the Municipal Corporation. Therefore, the respondent must be deemed to have been confirmed. Thereafter the only power which the Corporation had was to terminate the service of the respondednt in accordance with Classification Control and Appeal Rules after conducting an enquiry and giving him reasonable opportunity that too for misconduct. No such procedure was adopted. Therefore, the impugned notice was illegal and the High Court was justified in granting the decree. The first question is, which are the relevant rules that would be applicable to the respondent? Admittedly, the Municipal Council became a Municipal Corporation on or after August 26, 1967. A resolution .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... A probationer whose period of probation is not extended under this Sub-Rule but who has neither been confirmed nor discharged from service at the end of the period of probation shall be deemed to have been continued in service, subject to the condition of his service being terminable on the expiry of a notice of one calender month given in writing by either side. (3) A probationer shall undergo such training and pass such departmental examinations during the period of his probation as may be prescribed. (4) and (5) are not relevant, hence omitted. (6) On the successful completion of probation and the passing of the prescribed departmental examinations, the probationer shall be confirmed in the services or post to which he has been app .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e, the tenure could be put to an end, which was done in this case. In State of Punjab v.Dharam Singh, [1968] 3 SCR 1 considering the effect of continuing a probationer in service after the period of probation was completed, the Constitution Bench held that there was no rule for the extension of probation after October 1, 1960 and it was not possible to presume the competent authority extended it beyond October 1, 1960.Thus in the above case there was no power to extend the probation in the rules beyond the specified period. It was held that: The initial period of probation of the respondents ended on October 1, 1958. By allowing the respondents to continue in their posts thereafter without any express order of confirmation, the compete .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... th the proviso to regulation 17(1) which means that the probationary period could be extended for a period of one year more and the probationary period was further extended to one year during which period the service of the appellant was neither terminated nor was he reverted to his substantive post, instead he was allowed to continue. On those facts this Court held that since under those regulations' appellant's probationary period could not be extended beyond the maximum period of two years, he stood confirmed on the expiry of maximum probationary period and there after he could not be reverted to lower post treating him on probation . In M.A. Agarwal v. Gurgaon Bank Ors., [1987] Suppl. SCC 643 and in State of Gujarat v. Akhile .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cribed examinations. It is not the respondent's case that he passed all the examinations. He shall be deemed to be continued on probation. Before confirmation the appointing authority is empowered to terminate the service of the probationer by issuing on calender month's notice in writing and on expiry thereof the service stands terminated without any further notice. Within three months from the date of expiry of original two years period of probation and within one year's period, the order of termination was made. In this view the question of conducting an inquiry under the Classification Control and Appeal (Rules) after giving an opportunity and that too for specific charges does not arise. The High Court, therefore, committed .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates