9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (5) TMI 165X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ication the assessee submits that there is a typographical error in mentioning the refund claim amount in as much as the one denied by the Revenue was Rs. 6,76,301/- whereas, in the order of this Bench (Final Order No. 42565/2017 dated 29.10.2017) the same is mentioned as Rs. 6,26,301/-. 2. Today when the above application was taken up for hearing, Shri V. Srikanth, Ld. Advocate refers to the Or ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e same is rectifiable. Accordingly in Paragraph-2 the amount of Rs. 6,26,301/- is to be read as Rs. 6,76,301/-. Modified paragraph-2 reads as under: - "2. As the appellant had sold the said goods by raising invoices and upon payment of VAT, they claimed the refund of the same. The said refund claim to the extent of Rs. 6,76,301/- stands rejected by the Revenue on the ground that, whereas the goo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
