TMI Blog2019 (5) TMI 305X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ffected and so far as the payment was effected through crossed cheques and since all these cheques have been encashed, we are of the view that this is not a fit case where interference is to be made with the finding and reasoning given by the Tribunal. See APOLLO TYRES LIMITED [ 2019 (4) TMI 82 - KERALA HIGH COURT] Loss sustained on sale of NHPC bonds - HELD THAT:- Almost similar question was ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... M THOMAS (KAKKUZHIYIL), SRI. V. ABRAHAM MARKOS AND SRI. V. B. UNNIRAJ JUDGMENT P.R.Ramachandra Menon, J. This is an appeal preferred by the Revenue. Challenge is against Annexure-C order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in respect of the assessment year 1989-90. 2. Heard Sri.Christopher Abraham, the learned Stan ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the sides, the Tribunal interdicted the order passed by the Appellate Authority and granted some reliefs vide Annexure-C order, which is under challenge as mentioned above. 4. The appellant has suggested some questions as involving substantial questions of law, which are to the following effect:- Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ted 16.3.2001. The appeal preferred before the Commissioner, Income Tax (Appeals) was not fruitful to the requisite extent, which made the assessee to approach the Tribunal by filing further appeal. The version put forth by the assessee was accepted and leave was granted; which in turn is under challenge. Similar issue has already been considered by this Court in I.T.A.No.1329/2009. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|