TMI Blog2019 (6) TMI 380X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... appellants themselves is the date when they retrieved the copy of the order from the drawer of the expired worker. This fact itself leads to inevitable conclusion that the order was received by the assessee prior to the said date and was kept in the drawer and was taken out only on 26.02.2016. In such a scenario, the date of recovery of the order from the drawer of the employee, who had since expi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... DER NO-70502/2019 - Dated:- 28-2-2019 - Smt. Archana Wadhwa, Member (Judicial) And Mr. Anil G. Shakkarwar, Member (Technical) For The Appellant : Ms Vanashri Dubey, Advocate For The Respondent : Shri Pawan Kumar Singh, Supdt (AR) ORDER Per: Archana Wadhwa After hearing both the sides, w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ision or order appealed against‟, they have mentioned Not known. Got copy of order from the drawer of the expired worker on 26.02.2016‟, whereas in their application for condonation of delay, they are mentioning that they got the copy of the impugned Order on 11.03.2016. Further, the check list filed along with the appeal shows that against the column of Date of receipt of order̶ ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... emselves is the date when they retrieved the copy of the order from the drawer of the expired worker. This fact itself leads to inevitable conclusion that the order was received by the assessee prior to the said date and was kept in the drawer and was taken out only on 26.02.2016. In such a scenario, the date of recovery of the order from the drawer of the employee, who had since expired, c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
