TMI Blog2019 (6) TMI 872X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC, Mr. Pradeep Jha, Mr. Devank Maheshwary, Advocate. for R-1. Mr. Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel for R-2,3 & 4. O R D E R Issue Notice. Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent accepts notice. The petitioner is a Central Excise assessee; it manufactured printed/laminated plastic film and other related goods covered by heading No. 48 a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Rules 2004. The writ petitioner concededly protested. Ultimately the Additional Commissioner of Central Excise confirmed a demand of Rs. 9,07,947/- together with interest as well as penalty at Rs. 5,02,082/-. The petitioner claims that the order of the Additional Commissioner was not brought to its notice for various reasons, including the reason that when served upon its concerned employee, he wa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rder of the Commissioner (Appeal) and the CESTAT is set aside. The appeal preferred by the petitioner shall be considered now on the merits, subject to its depositing requisite pre-deposit of the mandatory 7.5% amount of duty and penalty within four weeks. The Commissioner shall issue notice after satisfying himself that these conditions are complied with and decide the appeal on its merit. All ri ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|