TMI Blog2016 (1) TMI 1420X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... i.S.V.Giri Kumar, AGA For The Respondent. ORDER The Government Advocate is directed to take notice. The petition is heard at the stage of Preliminary Hearing and is disposed of in terms of an earlier order in similar circumstances, in WP No.54688/2015 and connected cases, dated 05.01.2016, in the case of M/s Bharath Construction Company vs. The State of Karnataka and others. 2. The petitioner ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ct for such adjustment of tax, the petitioner is before this Court. 3. It is noticed that Division Bench of this Court in Warsaw Engineers, Bangalore vs. The Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, 2008 (64) KLJ 1134, had addressed the very same circumstance and it was held that the amounts paid to the sub contractor by the principal contractor which had already suffered tax in the hands of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|