TMI Blog2017 (12) TMI 1714X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... as not rectified the defects notified in the Defect Memo that Appeal fees to be paid under sub-head Others . Hence, it is inferred that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, having regard to Rule 19(2) of ITAT Rules and following the decision of the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Multiplan (India) Ltd. [ 1991 (5) TMI 120 - ITAT DELHI-D] and case of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... red on behalf of the assessee nor any adjournment petition has been filed. Further, the assessee has not rectified the defects notified in the Defect Memo that Appeal fees to be paid under sub-head Others . Hence, it is inferred that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. 3. Therefore, having regard to Rule 19(2) of ITAT Rules and following the decision of the De ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
