TMI Blog2019 (8) TMI 319X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... namely 'insurance auxiliary services' which is not an output service? - HELD THAT:- We adjourn the hearing of these two appeals by a week. We make it clear that on the next occasion if the Revenue is not represented to prosecute its Central Excise Appeal No.225 of 2014, we will be inclined to dismiss the Revenue's appeal. Stand over to 7th August, 2019. - CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... It was pointed out to us by the Revenue that its appeal on the aforesaid question has already been admitted in Central Excise Appeal No.225 of 2014 in respect of the same assessee and thus, this appeal would warrant admission. 3. At that time, Mr. Sriram, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent in Central Excise Appeal No.110 of 2019 had pointed out to us that after the admi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er of Central Excise Vs. GTL Infrastructure Ltd. (2019) TIOL 1370 wherein similar question has not been entertained after taking into account the above decisions. 4. Our attention was also drawn to the decision of this Court in GTL Infrastructure Ltd. (supra), wherein in paragraph 5 thereof, the Counsel for the Revenue had stated that on the same issue in HDFC Standard Life India ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 7. In the above circumstances, we adjourn the hearing of these two appeals by a week. We make it clear that on the next occasion if the Revenue is not represented to prosecute its Central Excise Appeal No.225 of 2014, we will be inclined to dismiss the Revenue's appeal. 8. Parties are also put to notice that Central Excise Appeal No.110 of 2019 along with Central Excise Appeal No.225 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
