TMI Blog2019 (8) TMI 1167X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the Appellant None for the Respondent ORDER Per: Ramesh Nair The Revenue filed the present appeal seeking confiscation of goods removed illicitly and consequent redemption fine. 2. Shri K.J. Kinariwala, Ld. Assistant Commissioner (AR) appearing on behalf of the Revenue submits that the unit is a 100% EOU and working as bonded warehouse for which B-17 bond is executed. Therefore, all the activ ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rk Remedies Limited vs. CCE (Export Promotion) Mumbai. 3. None appeared on behalf of the respondent despite notices. 4. We have carefully considered the submissions and perused the record. We find that ld. Commissioner (Appeals) did not confiscate the goods on the ground that the same was not available for confiscation, on the basis of judgments in the case of Shiv Kripa Ispat Pvt. Limited - 20 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|