Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (10) TMI 1118

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the assessment year 2011-12 in the assessment of the assessee. In respect of balance credits, admittedly what is liable to be added only peak credit as this is an unaccounted bank account and a perusal of the bank account clearly shows that there are withdrawals and deposits. However, it is noticed that the assessee has filed an application admitting its GP for the purpose of addition before the Hon ble Settlement Commission at 24%. The assessee has not shown any addition having been offered on account of the initial capital. Consequently, we are of the view that the interest of justice would be served, if the GP rate is adopted at 30% in respect of unaccounted credits in the Indian Bank account, which is the unaccounted bank account and has been accepted by the assessee - addition made by the AO in respect of the said bank account stands modified and the AO is directed to restrict the addition to 30% representing the GP and initial capital required in respect of the credit of ₹ 32,88,176/- accepted by the assessee for the assessment year 2010-11 and 30% as GP in respect of the credits accepted by the assessee to an extent of ₹ 2,59,70,330/- for the assessment ye .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Shri V.Arumugasamy group on 09.07.2013. As a consequence of search, all the assessees in the group filed Petition before the Settlement Commission. On account of peculiar state of affairs in the case of assessee, the Settlement Commission rejected the application of assessee for settlement vide order dated 05.04.2016. It was submitted that for assessment years 2010-11 2011-12, the issue was in respect of Savings bank account maintained by the assessee with Indian Bank, Sivakasi Branch, at new road, branch code No.1484 being Account No. 881752106. It was a further submission that admittedly this bank account was an undisclosed bank account. It was submitted that the bank manager of the said bank also knew that the said bank account was an undisclosed bank account and consequently, the Bank Manager used the said account of the assessee for certain unaccounted transactions of other customers of said branch. It was a submission that for assessment year 2010-11, the total credit in the said bank account was to an extent of ₹ 2,68,88,176/-. As against this, the credits belonging to the assessee was only in respect of credits of ₹ 32,88,176/- and 11 credits totaling to ͅ .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... explain us how this was done. Ans. (i) On 30th of March 2010 Shri Vasanthavikas has deposited bulk number of clearing cheques total amounting to ₹ 32,88,176/- for which I am producing computer screenshot and copy of voucher. On the same day cash of ₹ 20,00,000/- was withdrawn and I am producing copy of voucher bearing the signature of Shri Vasanthavikas at the back of the voucher. (ii) With regard to transactions on 31.03.2010, I stand by the reply of my branch Manager furnished vide letter dated 28.03.2016 as under:- On 31.03.2010 several credits amounting to ₹ 236.00 lakhs were credited to the subject account and reversed by way of debits on 03.04.2010. On verifiction of the records, we infer that these two transactions on 31.03.2010 and 03.04.2010 amounting to ₹ 236.00 lakhs each were not relating to Mr A. Vasanthavikas, but to different customers. On perusal of the statement of accounts of these customers we find that the sums were debited on 31.03.2010 and credited back to their accounts on 03.04.2010. Q.3. In the above reply, you have stated that the transactions on 31st .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... It was submitted by the ld.AR that there was a letter of Bank Manager, dated 28.03.2016, a copy of which was not available with the assessee, which related to above extracted portion in the said statement in reply to Question No.2. It was submitted that in the said letter it has been admitted by the Manager that for the year ended 31.03.2010, several credits amounts to ₹ 236 lakhs were reversed by way of debits on 03.04.2010 and such transactions did not relate to the assessee. Similarly, also in Qn.No.4 in respect of ₹ 1.41 crores. It was submitted that this evidence was available with the Revenue, when the Settlement application was even rejected by the Settlement Commission on 05.04.2016. It was submitted that as it has been admitted by the Branch Manager that the transactions did not belong to the assessee, the addition representing the same was liable to be deleted. It was a prayer in respect of the transaction relating to the assessee for the relevant two assessment years, that GP rate of 24% may be at the worst be confirmed. 4. In reply, ld.DR vehemently supported the order of the Assessing Officer and the order of the ld.CIT(A). Ld.DR su .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nds modified and the Assessing Officer is directed to restrict the addition to 30% representing the GP and initial capital required in respect of the credit of ₹ 32,88,176/- accepted by the assessee for the assessment year 2010-11 and 30% as GP in respect of the credits accepted by the assessee to an extent of ₹ 2,59,70,330/- for the assessment year 2011-12. 6. In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee for the assessment years 2010-11 2011-12 stands partly allowed. 7. In respect of assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14, and 2014-15, it was submitted by ld.AR that the additions in the said assessment years represented the unexplained expenditure. It was submitted that the said unexplained expenditure admittedly had been incurred by the assessee out of the said unaccounted income for the assessment years 2010-11 2011-12. The said income was available to the assessee for meeting the expenses for the assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14 2014-15. It was submitted that for assessment year 2012-13, the unexplained expenditures were an amount of ₹ 1,50,000/- on account of foreign travel expenses, an amount of ₹ 14,60,960/- paid .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates