TMI Blog2019 (12) TMI 98X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... CGST Act, 2017 to section 9 of the GST compensation cess Act, 2017 (Compensation to States) in terms of payment of tax in a wrong head - HELD THAT:- The applicant sought Advance Ruling in an issue of applicability of interest for the intervening period in the context of payment done under one Head i.e., Head of Cess instead of the other i.e., under the Head of CGST with a time gap of eight months ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mention of the dissimilar provision is made, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provision under the APGST Act. Further, henceforth, for the purposes of this Advance Ruling, a reference to such a similar provision under the CGST Act or APGST Act would be mentioned as being under the GST Act. 1. Brief Facts of the case: M/s. Venkata Rao Tirupathi, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the head cess instead of CGST on 23.10.2017. Again tax paid under the head CGST on 03.07.2018. Whether the interest is to be paid in the intervening period i.e., 23.10.2017 to 03.07.2018. Advance ruling requested with reference to section 77(2) of CGST act, 2017 read with section 9 of the GST compensation cess act, 2017 (compensation to states). 3. RECORD OF PERSONAL HEARING: ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... licability of a notification issued under the provisions of this Act, (c) determination of time and value of supply of goods or services or both, (d) admissibility of input tax credit of tax paid or deemed to have been paid, (e) determination of the liability to pay tax on any goods or services or both, (f) whether applicant is required to be registered, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
