9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (12) TMI 157X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for the Petitioner. Mr. D. Pangam, Advocate General with Mr. S. P. Munj, Addl. Government Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 and 4. Ms. Priyanka Kamat, Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos.5 and P.C. Heard Mr. G. K. Sardessai, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Ms. P. Kamat, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos.5 and 6. 2. Mr. Munj appears for Respondent Nos.3 and 4. Respondent Nos.1 and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... his Court in the case of O/E/N/India Ltd. & Anr Vs Union of India & others in WP No.2086 of 2018 which was disposed of on 24.10.2018 = 2018 (10) TMI 1620 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT, permitted the Petitioner in the said petition to make a representation to the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) and directed the CBIC to consider such representation for verification and the bonafide of the c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ssity to adjourn this matter any further. In fact, we note that in our order dated 05.03.2019 we had precisely recorded the very same statement made by Mr. Sardessai that the Petitioner will be satisfied that if the present petition is disposed of by making an order similar to the order dated 24.10.2018 in Writ Petition No.2086 of 2018. Thus considerable time has elapsed since making of our order ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 7. We clarify that in case the Petitioner is not satisfied with the response of the CBIC, liberty is reserved to the Petitioner to take out appropriate proceedings in the matter, inter alia on the grounds which have now been urged in this petition as well. This is because we have not examined the rival contentions on merits and we leave this exercise to the CBIC whilst disposing of the Petitioner& ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
