TMI Blog2019 (12) TMI 838X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... be said to be unjustified. The 2 nd respondent are directed to release the goods and vehicle to the petitioner on the petitioner furnishing a bank guarantee to cover the tax and penalty amounts determined in Ext.P3(d) notice. The 2nd respondent shall thereafter forward the file for adjudication under the CGST Act. Petition disposed off. - WP(C). No.34152 of 2019(T) - - - Dated:- 13-12-2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t hamper the generation of the e-way bill to cover the transaction. 2. On a consideration of the reasons for the detention, I am of the view that the detention of the goods cannot be said to be unjustified. Taking note of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, however, I direct the 2 nd respondent to release the goods and vehicle to the petitioner on the petition ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
