TMI Blog2019 (12) TMI 996X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... idering the contentions put forth by counsel for the Union of India, the bail cannot be granted - bail application rejected. - S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15702/2019 - - - Dated:- 16-12-2019 - HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Jhanwar For Union of India : Mr. Siddharath Ranka For State : Mr. Pank ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... edit have been claimed so far by any of the firms. 4. Counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on G-Tech Industries vs. Union of India 2016(339) E.L.T. 209 (P H) wherein Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that the statement recorded during inquiry/investigation may have been recorded under compulsion and the same cannot be said to be voluntary statement. 5. Couns ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and brother of petitioner has been recorded, they have also stated that present petitioner was involved in creating fake firm under GST. 7. I have considered the contentions. 8. Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the Union of India, I am not inclined to allow the bail application. 9. This bail application is accordingly rejected. - - TaxTMI - ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
