2018 (7) TMI 2078

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... yu Jain, Advocate For The Respondent. ORDER Mr. Vibhu Bakhru, 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, impugning an order dated 19.01.2018 (hereafter 'the impugned order') whereby the petitioner has been blacklisted and debarred from participating in any transaction with Delhi Prisons Department. 2. Mr Bhasin, the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner has assailed the im .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... uld also be debarred from participating in any business activity with Delhi Prisons Department in future. He also referred to the agreement dated 11.08.2016 entered into between the petitioner and the Director General (Prisons) and drew the attention of this Court to Clause 7 of the said agreement, which reads as under:- "7. The EMD and/or the Security Deposit shall be forfeited, if the successf .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ted. 6. The questions whether the petitioner has been afforded adequate opportunity to be heard and whether it was open for the respondents to blacklist the petitioner for participating any transaction for ever, need to be considered. There is good ground to hold that a party cannot be blacklisted for all times to come. There may also be instances where the person to be blacklisted is able to per .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X