9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (2) TMI 217X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ough: Mr. Subhash Bansal, Standing Counsel CHANDER SHEKHAR, J. 1. The present appeals were filed by the appellants against the judgment dated 6.10.2012 and subsequent order on sentence dated 11.10.2012 passed by the Special judge, NDPS, Patiala House Court, New Delhi wherein the appellants were convicted under Section 20(b)(ii)(c) read with Section 29 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Subs ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sel for the parties and have also perused the Trial Court record. 6. The appellants have not opted to challenge the findings of the learned Trial Court on conviction under Section 20(b)(ii)(c) read with Section 29 of the NDPS Act. Hence, the judgment on conviction of the Trial Court dated 6/10/2012 is affirmed. 7. As regards the order on quantum of sentence, the appellants were sentenced to unde ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Customs(supra) and Raj Kumar v. State(supra), the default sentence of the appellants is reduced from six months to two months. It is ordered that the appellants shall pay a fine of Rs. 1 lac each and in default of payment of fine, the appellants shall have to further undergo simple imprisonment for two months. 9. The appeals filed by the appellants are disposed of in the above terms. Pending app ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
