TMI Blog2020 (2) TMI 735X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... till disposal of the stay application to be filed by the petitioner before the Appellate/Administrative Commissioner. It is made clear that if the petitioner does not file an application for stay within a period of two (2) weeks from today, then, order dated 05.02.2020 will automatically stand revived. - Writ Petition No.3393 of 2020 And WMP Nos.3954 and 3956 of 2020 - - - Dated:- 12-2-2020 - Dr. Justice Anita Sumanth For the Petitioner : Mr.A.S.Sriraman For the Respondents : Mr.A.P.Srinivas, Senior Standing Counsel ORDER Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior Standing Counsel accepts notice for the respondents. 2. Since the lis falls within a short compass, by consent expressed and in fact at request of both learned counsel, this Writ Petition is disposed finally even at the stage of admission. 3. The impugned order dated 05.02.2020 reads as follows: '2. The petition for stay of collection is hereby rejected on the ground that mere filing of appeal before the CIT(A) is not a valid reason for stay of collection. Your request for stay of demand will be considered only on payment of 20% of the tax demand, as per the CBDT's Instruction No.1914 d ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 9; 9. Thereafter, Instruction No.1914 was issued by the CBDT on 21.03.1996 and states as follows: 1. Recovery of outstanding tax demands [Instruction No. 1914 F. No. 404/72/93 ITCC dated 2-12-1993 from CBDT] The Board has felt the need for a comprehensive instruction on the subject of recovery of tax demand in order to streamline recovery procedures. This instruction is accordingly being issued in supersession of all earlier instructions on the subject and reiterates the existing Circulars on the subject. 2. The Board is of the view that, as a matter of principle, every demand should be recovered as soon as it becomes due. Demand may be kept in abeyance for valid reasons only in accordance with the guidelines given below : A. Responsibility: i. It shall be the responsibility of the Assessing Officer and the TRO to collect every demand that has been raised, except the following: (a) Demand which has not fallen due;(b) Demand which has been stayed by a Court or ITAT or Settlement Commission;(c) Demand for which a proper proposal for write-off has been submitted;(d) Demand stayed in accordance with paras B C below. ii. Where demand in resp ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tive. ii. In granting stay, the Assessing Officer may impose such conditions as he may think fit. Thus he may - a. require the assessee to offer suitable security to safeguard the interest of revenue; b. require the assessee to pay towards the disputed taxes a reasonable amount in lump sum or in instalments; c. require an undertaking from the assessee that he will co-operate in the early disposal of appeal failing which the stay order will be cancelled. d. reserve the right to review the order passed after expiry of a reasonable period, say up to 6 months, or if the assessee has not co-operated in the early disposal of appeal, or where a subsequent pronouncement by a higher appellate authority or court alters the above situations; e. reserve a right to adjust refunds arising, if any, against the demand. iii. Payment by instalments may be liberally allowed so as to collect the entire demand within a reasonable period not exceeding 18 months. iv. Since the phrase stay of demand does not occur in section 220(6) of the Income-tax Act, the Assessing Officer should always use in any order passed under section 220(6) [or under section 220(3) or section 220(7)], the expres ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... case falls in the category discussed in pars (B) hereunder. (B) In a situation where, (a) the assessing officer is of the view that the nature of addition resulting in the disputed demand is such that payment of a lump sum amount higher than 15% is warranted (e.g. in a case where addition on the same issue has been confirmed by appellate authorities in earlier years or the decision of the Supreme Court /or jurisdictional High Court is in favour of Revenue or addition is based on credible evidence collected in a search or survey operation, etc.) or, (b) the assessing officer is of the view that the nature of addition resulting in the disputed demand is such that payment of a lump sum amount lower than 15% is warranted (e.g. in a case where addition on the same issue has been deleted by appellate authorities in earlier years or the decision of the Supreme Court or jurisdictional High Court is in favour of the assessee, etc.), the assessing officer shall refer the matter to the administrative Pr. CIT/ CIT, who after considering all relevant facts shall decide the quantum/ proportion of demand to be paid by the assessee as lump sum payment for granting a stay of the bal ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... trations have been provided in the Circulars themselves, the financial stringency faced by an assessee and the balance of convenience in the matter constitute the trinity , so to say, and are indispensable in consideration of a stay petition by the authority. The Board has, while stating generally that the assessee shall be called upon to remit 20% of the disputed demand, granted ample discretion to the authority to either increase or decrease the quantum demanded based on the three vital factors to be taken into consideration. 13. In the present case, the assessing officer has merely rejected the petition by way of a non-speaking order reading as follows: 'Kindly refer to the above. This is to inform you that mere filing of appeal against the said order is not a ground for stay of the demand. Hence your request for stay of demand is rejected and you are requested to pay the demand immediately. Notice u/s.221(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is enclosed herewith.' 14. The disposal of the request for stay by the petitioner leaves much to be desired. I am of the categoric view that the Assessing Officer ought to have taken note of the conditions precedent f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
