2020 (2) TMI 1219

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... TMI 526 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] - HELD THAT:- It is not in dispute that the said decision has been considered in the subsequent decision in G.E. India Technology Centre Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. . [ 2010 (9) TMI 7 - SUPREME COURT] and the court held that the question of payment of royalty ought to be determined by the High Court on merits and for that reason, it relegate .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... esh Kumar, Adv. Mr. B.K. Satija, Adv. Mr. Shreyash Bhardwaj, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Adv. Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, AOR ORDER Heard learned counsel for the parties. The High Court vide impugned judgment answered the question formulated against the assessee relying on the decision in Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. Vs. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. reported in [2010] 320 ITR 209 (Kar .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X