Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2020 (2) TMI 1243

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d by complainant on 14.09.2000. If this date is taken to be due service of notice by accused-applicant then 15 days' time would expire on 29.09.2000. In K. Bhaskaran Vs. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan and Others [ 1999 (9) TMI 941 - SUPREME COURT ], it was held that if a notice is returned by sender as unclaimed, such date would be commencing date in reckoning the period of 15 days contemplated in Clause (c) to proviso of Section 138 of Act, 1881 - In the present case, since payment could have been made upto 29.09.2000 but when it is not made, cause of action arose on 30.09.2000. Since complaint in the present case, was filed within one month i.e. October, 2000, after excluding 30.09.2000, the day when cause of action arose, it cannot be said that complaint is exfacie barred by time provided in Section 142(b) of Act, 1881 - Applications dismissed. - Application U/S 482 No. - 12606 of 2004, 12605 of 2004 - - - Dated:- 7-2-2020 - Sudhir Agarwal, J. For the Applicant : Anil Kumar Bajpai For the Opposite Party : A.G.A., Ajay Shanker Pandey ORDER SUDHIR AGARWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Bajpai, learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA for State of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pay any amount. He also raised objection that complaint was not maintainable having been filed by Assistant Manager who was not authorized by any Letter of Authorization or Resolution of Board of Directors of Cooperative Bank. He also contended that proceedings were initiated beyond the period prescribed under Section 138(b) of Act, 1881, inasmuch as, dishonoured cheques were returned to complainant on 24.08.2000, notice was issued on 06.09.2000 which was received back unclaimed on 14.09.2000 but complaint was filed on 31.10.2000, hence, it was barred by period of limitation prescribed under Section 142(b) of Act, 1881. 4. Said objection was rejected by Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned vide order dated 15.10.2004. Sri Bajpai, placed reliance on a Supreme Court's judgement in M/s Sil Import USA Vs. M/s Exim Aides Silk Exporters, Banglore 1999 (4) SCC 567 in support of his contention that complaint is barred by time. 5. In the connected case i.e. Application No. 12605 of 2004, similar complaint has been filed wherein also summoning order was issued on 21.11.2000 and objection of accused-applicant was rejected on 15.10.2004. Here, in connected case, cheque no. 823489 dat .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... yment of the said amount of money to the payee or, as the case may be, to the holder in due course of the cheque, within fifteen days of the receipt of the said notice. Explanation.- For the purposes of this section, debt or other liability means a legally enforceable debt or other liability. 142 Cognizance of offences - Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974)- (a) no court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under section 138 except upon a complaint, in writing, made by the payee or, as the case may be, the holder in due course of the cheque; (b) such complaint is made within one month of the date on which the cause of action arises under clause (c) of the proviso to section 138. (c) no court inferior to that of a Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of the first class shall try any offence punishable under section 138. (Emphasis added) 8. As per complaint, following dates are relevant: Date Events 24.08.2000 Cheques were submitted for collection by complainant-Cooperative Bank. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... en defined in Act, 1881 but it is defined in Section 3(35) of General Clauses Act, 1897 (hereinafter referred to as Act, 1897 ) and reads as under:- (35) month shall mean a month reckoned according to the British calendar. (Emphasis added) 13. The definition of month in Act, 1897, therefore, talks of a month of British Calendar i.e. January, February etc. 14. There are 12 months in a British Calendar wherein 7 months have 31 days; 4 months have 30 days and one month has 28 days except leap year when it has 29 days. Therefore, number of days in the month varies. 15. Thus, one aspect is whether it should be number of days or corresponding month irrespective of number of days which has to be taken for the purpose of Section 142(b) of Act, 1881 . Secondly, if it is number of days i.e. 30 or 31 then whether it will include the day when cause of action has arisen . For example, if we take 30 days by including the date of cause of action, it will expire on 29.10.2000 but if we take it 31 days then it will expire on 30.10.2000. However, if the date of cause of action is excluded then period of month will commence from 01.10.2000 and if it goes with the definition .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates