TMI Blog2020 (3) TMI 824X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nce of the said Form and to grant benefit of the same to the revisionist. The Tribunal has recorded a finding that form 3-D was pertaining to assessment year 2002-03, where as the assessment pertains to the year 1998-99 and therefore Forms have been procured by the revisionist after two years of the assessment, therefore, benefit of the same cannot be granted to the revisionist. Revision dismissed. - SALES/TRADE TAX REVISION No. 20 of 2010 - - - Dated:- 14-1-2020 - Hon'ble Alok Mathur, J. For Revisionist : Praveen Kumar For Opposite Party : C.S.C. ORDER Hon'ble Alok Mathur, J. Heard Sri Praveen Kumar, learned counsel for the revisionist as well as Sri Bipin Kumar Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... led second appeal under Section 10 of Trade Tax Act before the Commercial Tax Tribunal. The revisionist also submitted an application under Section 12B before the Tribunal with the prayer to accept Form 3-D which were received by the revisionist after the order passed by the authorities. The Tribunal rejected the claim of the revisionist on the ground that since the matter relates to assessment year 1998-99 and submitted Form 3D after a period of two years as prescribed under the Act and therefore the benefit of the same cannot be granted to the revisionist. Against the order of the Tribunal, the revisionist has preferred the instant revision. The instant revision has been admitted on the following questions of law : a) Whether, th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Industries Vs. Commissioner Trade Tax, U.P. Lucknow, 2019 UPTC (Vol. 103) 1014, under similar circumstances up held the order of the Tribunal relying upon the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of K.B. Hides Vs. State of U.P. and Others, 2004 UPTC 292, held that the benefit of Form 3-D cannot be issued beyond the period of two years from the end of the assessment year. The judgment of the Tribunal is in consonance with the pronouncements of this Court and no infirmity inthe same could be pointed out. No other point was urged by learned counsel for the revisionist. There is no error in the impugned judgment and order of the Tribunal. The revision is accordingly dismissed. The question of law mentioned above are ans ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
