TMI Blog2019 (2) TMI 1823X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ature of the proceedings is not changed nor does there arise a separate of cause of action. In the present application, the applicant is seeking incorporation of prayer clauses (D) and (E) in I. A. No. 468 of 2018. Application allowed. - I. A. Nos. 16 of 2019 in 468 of 2018 in C. P. (IB) Nos. 39 and 40 of 2017. - - - Dated:- 25-2-2019 - Harihar Prakash Chaturvedi And Ms. Manorama Kumari Jud ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... resolution professional as party respondent No. 2 in the cause title of I. A. No. 468 of 2018. Hence, the applicant craves leave to join Shri Satish kumar Gupta, the resolution professional as respondent No. 2 in the cause title. 3. That apart, the applicant has also prayed for incorporating two more prayers in the prayer clause of the main application, i. e., I. A. No. 468 of 2018, which are a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... has challenged the decision of the insolvency resolution professional reducing the claim of ₹ 544 crores of the applicant authority to the extent of ₹ 1, being arbitrary and without jurisdiction. It is further submitted that the claim of the State Tax Department is in respect of the crystallized dues of value added tax which have now been accrued to the tune of ₹ 995.53 crores. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lauses (D) and (E) in I. A. No. 468 of 2018. Since the arguments in respect of I. A. No. 468 of 2018 were already heard, it is made clear that even if the present application for amendment is allowed, it would not confer any further right for denovo hearing of the main I. A. At the best, the applicant may file written submissions, if any, because the present case is a time bound matter. 6. In v ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
