Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2020 (4) TMI 533

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... losed investments u/s 69 of the Act on account of alleged cash loan given a) by holding content of dumb documents i.e. page 93, 94 and 95 seized from the business premises of M/s Prakash Industries Limited during search action as true. b) without considering the fact that content of the affidavit have been confirmed by Ld. AO through cross examination of the deponents and by recording their statement during remand proceedings. c) by holding that retraction of statement by appellant, filing of affidavits and denying of receipt of loan by the parties (deponents) in their statement is just after thought without bringing any material in support of his contention." 3. Brief facts of the case are that a search and seizure operation was con .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pages numbered 93, 94 and 95, has submitted as under: "Question no. 38: I am showing you page no. 93, 94 and 95 of Annexure A- 12 seized from you premises at Brijwasan. Please explain the contents of these pages. Answer: Page No. 93 and 95 are repeats. Page No. 95 is a receipt given by Sh. C.B. Bansal, Advocate R/o Laxmi Nagar Area for the cash loan (loan given in cash) given by me to him. This loan of Rs. 15 lacs was given to him sometimes in the month of October 2012. Out of my cash balance page n. 94 is a receipt given by Mahamantra Das of Iskcon Temple for the loan given in cash by me to him amounting to Rs. 20 lacs. This loan was given by me in the month of April, 2012 and he has repaid in cash as amount of Rs. 3.6 lacs." 9. Subs .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tment to even remotely establish that any undisclosed income was made by me or any of the group companies. There was also no evidence what so ever to show that any cash has been generated or paid to anybody for bringing any share capital, share application or unsecured loan. Hence, I can say with authority and conviction and full knowledge that none of the allegations made against me and the group is backed by any documentary evidence found during the course of search. I was compelled to sign documents/statements which, respectfully submitting, were mere figments of the imagination of the concerned officers. I, therefore, completely and totally retract from the disclosure of Rs. 77.74 crores extracted from me on behalf of the company." 1 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the receipt. Particularly, in view of the effect that you have not brought any record/documents. Ans.: I am not aware of the same. Q.No. 8: Where are you assessed to tax? Ans.: I am presently assessed with Circle 58(1), Delhi and my PAN No. is AATPB5963C. Q.No.: How do you know M/s Prakash Industries Ld.? Ans.: I am consultant of M/s Prakash Industries Ltd." 11. In addition, Sh. C.B. Bansal has also filed an affidavit dated 10.03.2015 before the Assessing Officer reaffirming his statement. 12. Further, the Assessing Officer has also recorded statement of Sh. Mahamantra Das (Kamla Shankar Dubey, the other name) R/o 165, Ground Floor, ISKCON wherein he categorically refused of having taken any loan from the assessee. The relevant .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t the statements and affidavits are nothing but an afterthought and only to help the assessee. 15. Holding this, he confirmed the addition. We also find that the ld. CIT (A) has also confirmed the fact that "the three unsigned receipts are incriminating documents found in the search and seizure action u/s 132, which shows actual transactions have been taken place. On going through the entire factual position, we are unable to accept with the observation of the ld. CIT (A) who has confirmed the addition and at the same time accepting the fact that the receipts are unsigned and yet treating them as incriminating documents. The sequence of events are reiterated as under: 30.10.2012 Search conducted and statement recorded u/s 132(4). 02.11 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates