9911796707
TMI Blog1974 (5) TMI 119X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... instituted in the court of Munsif, Allahabad. The suit was valued at less than ₹ 2,000/-. Before evidence in the suit could begin the U. P. Civil Laws Amendment Act, 1972 came into force. Under it suits for ejectment and recovery of arrears of rent and damages became small causes in nature. Section 9 of the Act provided for the transfer of such suits pending in regular courts to the court of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r, heard the appeal on the question that the decree passed by the trial Court was without jurisdiction and a nullity. He found that conflicting inferences could be drawn from different Full Bench decisions of this Court, and in view of the importance of the question involved in the context of the new Civil Laws Amendment Act, 1972, it was a fit case in which the appeal should be heard by a larger ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ble to be transferred to it from the regular side, but nonetheless, it continued to retain its nature, namely, small causes. In that event Section 102 which applies to suits of the nature of small causes but which are tried on the regular side, is fully applicable. Under it no second appeal lies. The present second appeal is clearly in competent. 6. At this stage learned counsel for the appellan ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r appellate court. Under the circumstances we do not think that this is a fit case where the prayer for conversion of the appeal into a revision should be sustained. We, therefore, decline to convert the appeal into a revision. 7. After the hearing was over, learned counsel for the appellant submitted a note containing references of four authorities. Having perused them we find that they are not ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
