Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2020 (8) TMI 255

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eafter reserved for orders. The grievance of the Petitioner in this petition is that despite the matter being reserved for orders, no orders were pronounced in the Order XII Rule 6 application. Accordingly, the present petition seeks directions to be given for early disposal of the said application. 3. Mr. Harsh Kumar, ld. counsel for the Petitioner submits that the grievance of the Petitioner is that the order was not pronounced for a long time. On 8th July, 2020, due to the COVID-19 lockdown, the matter was simply adjourned for orders to 31st July, 2020. Ld. Counsel submits that this Court in Deepti Khera v. Siddharth Khera [CM (M) 1637/2019, decided on 18th November, 2019], clearly holds that pronouncement of orders and judgements canno .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed for three months, the litigant is entitled to approach the High Court. The same is clear from a reading of the Supreme Court's judgment in Anil Rai v. State of Bihar [2001] 7 SCC 318. This judgement was considered in Deepti Khera (supra) wherein it has been clearly held as under: "6. It is the settled position in law, as per the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Anil Rai v. State of Bihar [2001] 7 SCC 318 that once matters are reserved for orders, usually, the same should be pronounced within a time schedule. In Anil Rai (supra) it has been observed as under: "8. The intention of the legislature regarding pronouncement of judgments can be inferred from the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sub-section (1) o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... iod of that month. (iii) On noticing that after conclusion of the arguments the judgment is not pronounced within a period of two months, the Chief Justice concerned shall draw the attention of the Bench concerned to the pending matter. The Chief Justice may also see the desirability of circulating the statement of such cases in which the judgments have not been pronounced within a period of six weeks from the date of conclusion of the arguments amongst the Judges of the High Court for their information. Such communication be conveyed as confidential and in a sealed cover. (iv) Where a judgment is not pronounced within three months from the date of reserving it, any of the parties in the case is permitted to file an application in the H .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ment of the judgment, and such day shall not ordinarily be a day beyond sixty days from the date on which the hearing of the case was concluded, and due notice of the day so fixed shall be given to the parties or their pleaders.]" 9. While this Court is conscious of the fact that there are pressures on the Trial Courts, non-pronouncement of orders for more than a year cannot be held to be justified. It has been observed in several matters that trial courts keep matters `FOR ORDERS' for months together and sometimes orders are not pronounced for even 2-3 years. Thereafter the judicial officer is transferred or posted in some other jurisdiction and the matter has to be reargued. Such a practice puts enormous burden on the system and on .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ner, being HMA No. 687/2015 (re-numbered as HMA No. 48736/2016), has been pending adjudication since 2015. Judgment therein was reserved on 18-1-2020. The petition was thereafter posted for judgment on various dates and was last listed on 4-4-2020. Due to the office order mentioned hereinabove, the judgment in the petition has still not been pronounced and the matter was adjourned. The petitioner by way of the present petition prays that the office order mentioned hereinabove be amended so as to enable the learned Trial Court to pass the judgment/final order in the above petition. Keeping in view the limited nature of the prayer made in the present petition, I do not deem it necessary to issue a formal notice to the respondents to seek the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates