9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (8) TMI 658X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Ys. 2011-12 & 2010-11 vide even date 23.03.2016 under section 143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter 'the Act'). 2. The only issue in these appeals of assessee is against the order of CIT(A) confirming the addition made by AO off non-genuine and bogus purchases by applying profit rate at the rate of 12.5% of the bogus purchases. For this assessee has raised identically worded grounds in both the years i.e. 2010-11 & 2011-12 except the quantum. The facts and circumstances are exactly identical in both the years and hence, we will take the facts from AY 2010-11 and will decide the issue. The grounds raised in AY 2010-11 reads as under: - "2010-11 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Hon&# ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Total 47,08,701 In AY 2011-12 S.No. Name of party Amount 1. Dev Deep Steel 37,08,555 2. Jay Vijay Tubes Pvt. Ltd. 13,05,274 3. Fortune Sales Corporation 11,20,007 4. Ratan Deep Tubes 25,23,316 5. Veer Industries 20,60,318 6. Chambal Steel & Alloys 18,97,705 Total 1,26,15,175 4. The AO issued noticed under section 133(6) to the parties which returned back with the remark as "left" and assessee failed to produce these parties. During the course of assessment proceedings and during appellate proceedings, the assessee failed to submit documents in respect of evidences such as movement of goods i.e. the transportation bills, delivery challan and weighment slips, etc. But, the assessee filed th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ices, bank statements etc. However, some of the specific details required to establish the genuineness of purchase such delivery challans, transport receipts, etc could not be submitted before the A.O. Nor the Principle Officer of these concerns were produced before the A.O. for examination. However, it is also a fact that the A.O. has not questioned the total sale component and if there is a sale there should be purchase. The appellant being a trading concern, had indulged in using such accommodation entry. As evident from catena of judgment of bogus purchases, only the benefit derived by using such accommodation entries has to be brought to tax. The advantages from using such bogus bills are in the form of saving VAT, saving of transpor ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
