Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2020 (10) TMI 238

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s contemplated under s.11(1)(a) and Sect ion 11(1) (b)? - HELD THAT:- Where an assessee trust has made excess application of its income, the option or entitlement vested upon an assessee to accumulate 15% for indefinite period in our view cannot operate as an obligation enforceable against it in the absence of accumulation. The method of computation of deficit to be truncated artificially 15% based on an entitlement (opposed to an obligation) as suggested by first appellate authority is totally devoid of any logic. This would tantamount to application of concession conferred on assessee in a reverse manner and thus put the assessee in a worser position in the event of accelerated application of receipts for salutary purposes. The action .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sed by assessee read as under : 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Commissioner of Income- tax (Appeals) erred in holding that the 15% of gross receipts allowed to be accumulated under sect ion 11(1)(a) ought to be reduced from the amount allowed to be carried forward as deficit. 3. The assessee is a public charitable trust engaged in educational activities and registered under s.12AA of the Act. In the course of assessment proceedings for the AY 2015-16, it was noticed by the AO that assessee has claimed carried forward deficit of ₹ 72,03,285/- for the year under consideration together with deficits of other assessment years. I t was claimed by the assessee trust that it has incurred exces .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n of the co-ordinate bench in Maharshi Karve Stree Shikshan Samstha Karvenagar vs. ITO 174 ITD 591 (Pune) which, in turn, inter alia relied upon the observations made by the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Programme for Community Organisation [2001] 248 ITR 1 (SC) and Addl.CIT vs. A. L. N. Rao Charitable Trust [1995] 216 ITR 697 (SC). It was thus contended on behalf of the assessee that trust is entitled to whole of the deficit resulting from excess application of its income without any artificial reduction equivalent to 15% entitlement contemplated under s.11(1)(a) of the Act. 7. The learned DR, on the other hand, relied upon the observations made by the CIT(A) for reduction in the quantum of deficit allowed to be carried f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d for set off in subsequent assessment years having regard to statutory permission towards 15% accumulation under s.11(1) (a)/11(1)(b) of the Act without any time limit. 8.2 To delineate on the issue, it may be pertinent to note that in order to be eligible for claiming exemption, i t is essential that the income of the trust is applied for charitable objects. A charitable trust or institution is required to apply at least 85% of income derived from trust property towards charitable purposes. If the income spent on charitable or religious purposes during the previous year falls short of 85% of the income derived during the year, such shortfall may be subjected to tax in certain circumstances. Hence, a statutory obligation has been cast o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... efinite period in our view cannot operate as an obligation enforceable against it in the absence of accumulation. The method of computation of deficit to be truncated artificially 15% based on an entitlement (opposed to an obligation) as suggested by first appellate authority is totally devoid of any logic. This would tantamount to application of concession conferred on assessee in a reverse manner and thus put the assessee in a worser position in the event of accelerated application of receipts for salutary purposes. The action directed by CIT(A) has the effect of deprivation of concession granted and is repugnant to the intended outcome. The Pune Bench of Tribunal in Maharshi Karve Stree Shikshan Samstha Karvenagar vs. ITO 174 ITD 591 (Pu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates