TMI Blog2020 (10) TMI 314X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ffices for Petitioner Ms. S. D. Vyas, B Panel Counsel for Respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4-State. Mr. Rajan Mishra i/b. Mr. Mihir Deshmukh for Respondent ORDER P. C. Heard Mr. Nankani, learned senior counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Vyas, learned AGP for respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4. We have also heard Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for respondent Nos.5. 2. On 25.09.2020, Ms. Vyas, learned AGP for the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e petitioner was not cancelled. 4. Issue notice, returnable four weeks. 5. Parties may file affidavit by the returnable date. 6. Petitioner was granted certificate of registration by the State of Maharashtra under the Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) Rules, 1957 whereby petitioner was registered as a dealer under section 7(1) / 7(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. By the impugn ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ner vis-a-vis the judgment in Carpo Power Limited (supra), we are of the prima facie view that the aforesaid decision may be applicable to the case of the petitioner. That apart, Special Leave Petition filed by the State of Haryana against the aforesaid decision was dismissed by the Supreme Court holding that there was no legal and valid ground for interference. 9. In view of the above, there sha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|