TMI Blog2019 (6) TMI 1532X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rized Representative for the Respondent ORDER PER: S.K. MOHANTY Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the appellant herein had filed the shipping bills dated 02.11.2011, describing the goods as ladies garments. However, during examination of goods, the shed staff found that the appellant has declared the value of subject goods on the higher side. It was also observed that in respect ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of fine of Rs. 6 Lakhs under the provisions of Section 125(1) of the Customs Act, 1962. The impugned order also imposed penalty of Rs. 4 Lakhs on the appellant under Section 114 (iii) ibid. Feeling aggrieved with the impugned order, the appellant has preferred this appeal before the Tribunal. 2. Heard both sides and perused the records. 3. We find that the proceedings were initiated against the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|