9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (10) TMI 1017X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... both for concealment of income and furnishing inaccurate particulars of income in respect of additions of Rs. 1,36,00,030/- made under section 68 by the A.O. (ii) The Ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that inappropriate words in the penalty notice issued by the Ld. A.O. for levy of penalty are not stuck off and the notice does not specify as to whether the assessee has concealed its particulars of income or has furnished inaccurate particulars of income. (iii) The Ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that the accounts of the appellant were duly audited and additions to the capital accounts of the appellant were from the known sources. (iv) The Ld. CIT(A) has also failed to appreciate that the Ld. A.O. has not brought any evidence ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the Ld. A.O. to hold under which provisions of law addition of Rs. 28,25,138/- was made. 3. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A)has erred both on the facts and in law in upholding order of the A.O. levying penalty in respect of additions of Rs. 1,36,00,030/-made u/s 68 by the A.O. and additions of Rs. 28,25,138/- on account of credit entries in Saving Bank account of the appellant before deciding quantum appeal No. 57/IT/CIT(A)-1/LDH/2016-17 of the appellant filed against the order of the A.O. dated 14/03/2016 passed u/s 144 whereby aforesaid additions made by the A.O. have been challenged. 4. The appellant craves the right to add, alter, amend any ground(s) of appeal before or at the time of hearing. 3. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... re and were made by the A.O. by passing the exparte assessment order. The Ld. CIT(A) sustained the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act on the addition of Rs. 1,36,00,000/- and Rs. 28,25,138. 6. Now the assessee is in appeal. 7. Ld. Counsel for the Assessee at the very outset stated that when the appeal of the assessee on the penalty levied by the A.O. under section 271(1)(c) of the Act was filed, the another appeal on quantum addition was pending before the Ld. CIT(A) who deleted the addition of Rs. 1,36,00,030/- and the addition of Rs. 27,22,138/- out of the addition of Rs. 28,25,138/-. He furnished the copy of the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-1, Ludhiana dt. 09/07/2019 wherein the aforesaid addition had been deleted vide para 9 and 13 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
