TMI Blog2020 (11) TMI 19X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... using and examining the order, dated 20.12.2013 passed by the second respondent, this Court is of the considered view that no useful purpose would be served if this writ petition is kept pending. Instead, a direction can be issued to the third respondent to process and settle the refund application, dated 11.02.2014 submitted by the petitioner seeking for refund of a sum of ₹ 3,07,141/- w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ER This writ petition has been filed for a Mandamus seeking for a direction to the respondents to refund the amount of ₹ 3,07,141/- claimed by the petitioner vide an application dated 11.02.2014 by giving effect to the order passed by the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise (Appeals), Trichy vide Order-in-Appeal No.221/2013 (TTN) in Appeal No.C24/41/2013- TTN(CUS), dated 20.12.201 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... unter affidavit has been filed by the respondents. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, to the knowledge of the petitioner, till date, no appeal has been preferred by the respondents, aggrieved by the order in Appeal No.221/2013 (TTN), dated 20.12.2013. After considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and after perusing and examining the o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2014 seeking for the refund of excess duty paid by them within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law. 7. However, it is made clear that if any stay has been granted against the petitioner by any appellate forum/ Court, the same shall be disclosed in the final orders passed by the third respondent, pursu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
