TMI Blog2020 (11) TMI 252X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rved if the matter is remanded back to the respondent no.3 who has unlimited jurisdiction as to the value of authorisation to decide the case afresh on the basis of the show cause notice dated 6th June, 2018 appearing at page 303 of the writ petition (Annexure P- 10) issued by the respondents. All points are kept open. The petitioners shall be at liberty to rely upon the document which forms part ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e Deputy Director General of Foreign Trade which appears at pages 34 to 37 of the writ petition. It is the contention of the petitioners that the territorial jurisdiction of Regional Authority to decide cases as that of the petitioner is provided in appendix 1A of the Appendices and Aayat Niryat Forms. The petitioners for this purpose refer to entry 2.04 at page 389 of the writ petition. The petit ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tion is about ₹ 6.52 crores and as such the Deputy Director General of Foreign Trade having jurisdiction upto ₹ 10 crores was entitled to adjudicate the dispute. This submission is, however, disputed by the Advocate for the petitioners on the ground that the notification at page 469 according to him relates to penalty and not the authorisation amount. Without going into the dispute ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tioners to represent its case. It is made clear that the form of hearing shall be decided by the respondent no.3 and only broad compliance of principles of natural justice is required to be done owing to the prevailing pandemic situation. Since I have not called for any affidavit, all allegations contained in the writ petition are deemed to have not been admitted by the respondents. Nothing ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
