2020 (11) TMI 499

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ntire proceedings in Annexure-2 final report. Of course there may be legal contentions to the petitioners regarding the maintainablity of the prosecution. But, when the petitioners themselves admit that this is the counter blast to a prosecution initiated by them against the de facto complainant under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, this Court can not quash one proceedings invoking the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ant, which is given to the 1 st accused as security and hence cheated the de facto complainant. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that, the 1st petitioner initiated a prosecution under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act against the de facto complainant in this case as evident by Anne .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . 6. After hearing both sides, I think, this is not a fit case in which I can quash the entire proceedings in Annexure-2 final report. Of course there may be legal contentions to the petitioners regarding the maintainablity of the prosecution. But, when the petitioners themselves admit that this is the counter blast to a prosecution initiated by them against the de facto complainant under Secti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X