TMI Blog2020 (11) TMI 680X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... es Act, 2013 (for brevity 'the Act') against the order of striking off the name of the company, passed by the Respondent under Section 248 (1) of the Act,issued vide notification no. ROC/DELHI/248(5)/STK-7/4865 dated on 08.08.2018by Registrar of Companies, the respondent herein. 2. The Appellant states that the companywas incorporated as a Private Limited Company with the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi and Haryana under the Companies Act, 1956on 05.06.2014with CIN U25190 DL2014 PTC267824,having its registered office at ZB, 37/487, Dilshad Garden, Industrial Area, Zulfe Bengal Delhi East Delhi- 110095, within the jurisdiction of this Tribunal. 3. The Authorized Share Capital of the company is Rs. 1,00,000/- divided into 10,000 equity ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... plugs, socket, aerial gears, diodes and allied items intended for and used in electronic devices and in air conditioners, refrigerators, washing machines, heaters and cooking ranges and other types of domestic appliances and any type of equipment used in the generation, transmission and receiving of sound, light and electrical impulses and component parts thereof and other materials used in or in connection with electronic and electrical industries. (ii) And the other main objects. 5. The Respondent herein had issued Public notice bearing No. ROC/DELHI/248/STK-5/2018/2912 dated 18.06.2018.Consequently, Appellant's name was struck off vide notice bearing No. ROC/DELHI/248(5)/STK-7/4865 dated on 08.08.2018(Company's name appearing at Sl. N ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dated 04.12.2017 being Udyog Aadhaar Memorandum. 8. ROC has filed its reply and stating that they have no objection if the name of company is restored in the Register of Companies, subject to appellant filing all its pending statutory documents with the Registrar of Companies till date along with the requisite late filing fee as prescribed under the Companies Act, 2013. 9. The Income Tax Department has filed its reply on 20.01.2020 in which it has been submitted that the Company has not filed its Income Tax Return for the A. Y. 2013-14 to 2017-18. It further states that there are no pending cases against the Company and no cash deposits have been made by the company in the period of demonetization. 10. The grounds contemplated under sect ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... filing of all outstanding documents with proper filing fees along with additional fees required under law and completion of all formalities, including payment of any late fee or any other charges which are leviable by the respondent for the late filing of statutory returns, and also subject to payment of Rs. 25,000/- to be paid to Prime Minister's Relief Fund. The name of the Appellant Company shall then, as a consequence, stand restored to the Register of the Registrar of Companies, as if the name of the company had not been struck off in accordance with Section 248(1) of the Companies Act, 2013.
13. The Appeal stands allowed and disposed of in the above terms.
14. Let the copy of the order be served to the parties. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|